To
order by phone:
(801)
374-6214
To
order by fax:
(801)
374-0634
To
order by email.
or for questions:
Click here.
[ Home ]
Site
produced and administered by
International Library Service.
Copyright 1998-2000.
All rights reserved.
Direct comments to:
International Library Service
P.O. Box 735
Provo, Utah 84603
|
NFPA
551(07)
Evaluation of Fire Risk Assessments
Softbound,
26 pp., 2007
$45.00
Use NFPA 551 to approve or evaluate fire and life safety
solutions based on fire risk assessments.
The application of fire risk assessment methods in developing
fire and life safety solutions continues to increase. NFPA 551 identifies
various types of fire risk assessment methods and describes the properties
these methods should possess.
The Guide addresses:
-
Applying risk informed decision-making for fire safety
-
Selecting fire scenarios, identifying representative
challenging scenarios and grouping such scenarios into clusters for
the purposes of conducting more effective consequence analysis
-
Documentation that should accompany a fire risk assessment
-
Capabilities of those conducting a fire risk assessment
Revised with up-to-date terms concerning performance-based
design and fire risk assessment methods, this 2007 edition adds:
-
Guidance on how to address uncertainty when conducting
a fire risk assessment
-
Factors to consider when conducting or reviewing a
fire risk assessment
-
Guidance on how to address the changing effectiveness
of fire protection equipment, features, programs, and procedures
-
Expanded discussion on the role of qualitative, semi-quantitative
likelihood, semi-quantitative consequence, and quantitative methods
in a fire risk assessment
-
Expanded discussion on cost benefit analysis
-
More detail on proper documentation and elements of
a fire risk assessment
-
Expanded guidance on applying risk informed decision
making for various fire safety goals including the preservation of
cultural resources
NFPA 551 also covers the purpose and importance of an
operations and maintenance manual in conducting a fire risk assessment,
and the importance of using checklists that address both likelihood
and consequence.
|
|