SEARCH NORMAS!

Key words or numbers

To order by phone:
(801) 374-6214

To order by fax:
(801) 374-0634

To order by email.
or for questions:
Click here.


Home ] Up ]

SP-1998
Safety Test Methodology and Structural Crashworthiness 2006
April 2006, 19 Papers, 203 Pages, Paperbound
$110.00


This Special Publication is a collection of related SAE technical papers from one or more technical sessions at a particular SAE event.

Papers in: SP-1998

  • 2006-01-0669 Some Challenges to Crashworthiness Analysis
  • 2006-01-0670 Optimal Crash Pulse for Minimization of Peak Occupant Deceleration in Frontal Impact
  • 2006-01-0671 A Magic Cube Approach for Crashworthiness Design
  • 2006-01-0672 Convergence Study On Explicit Finite Element for Crashworthiness Analysis
  • 2006-01-0717 An Application of Car Crash Test Technology to a Causal Investigation of a Revolving Door Accident
  • 2006-01-0718 Development of a Prototype Safety Analysis System to Assess and Forecast Vehicle Safety
  • 2006-01-0719 A New Calibration Specification for Linear Displacement Transducers
  • 2006-01-0720 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 208 - Occupant Crash Protection: Right Front Passenger Test Methodologies
  • 2006-01-0721 A Dynamic Component Rollover Crash Test System
  • 2006-01-0722 Simple Models for Analysis of Curb- and Soil-Trip Rollover Events
  • 2006-01-0723 Image Analysis of A Rollover Crash Test Using Photogrammetry
  • 2006-01-0724 Analysis of Vehicle Kinematics in Laboratory-Based Rollover Test Modes
  • 2006-01-0952 Minibaja Frame Design Using Topological Optimization and Impact Testing
  • 2006-01-0954 Structural Design Optimization of the Body Section Using the Finite Element Method
  • 2006-01-0955 Adhesive Modeling in Crash Simulation
  • 2006-01-0958 Yet Another Look At Crash Pulse Analysis
  • 2006-01-0959 Modeling of Spot Weld under Impact Loading and Its Effect on Crash Simulation
  • 2006-01-1666 Lower-Body Injury Rates in Full-Engagement Frontal Impacts: Field Data and Logistic Models
  • 2006-01-1682 Comparison of Dynamic and Static Web Loop Deployment Forces